The lawmaker representing Oyi/Ayamelum Federal Constituency of Anambra State, Maureen Gwacham, has responded to a viral video that sparked criticism online, clarifying that she was unaware of the details of a motion she seconded during plenary proceedings.
The video, which has circulated widely on social media in recent days, captured a moment in the legislative chamber where Gwacham seconded a motion but appeared unable to explain its substance when prompted by the Speaker. The clip triggered backlash from some commentators, with critics labeling her a “bench warmer” and questioning her engagement in legislative duties.
Addressing the controversy in a statement issued on Wednesday, the lawmaker explained that the incident occurred under circumstances that left her briefly unprepared. According to her, she had just arrived and was still settling into her seat when she was unexpectedly called upon to second the motion.
“I was momentarily caught off guard during the plenary,” she said. “I had just settled into my seat when the Speaker beckoned on me to second the motion.”
Gwacham further clarified that the motion had been moved by Muktar Tolani Shagaya, whom she described as a respected colleague known for presenting well-considered legislative proposals. She suggested that her decision to second the motion was influenced by her confidence in the credibility of the sponsor.
The lawmaker also provided details of the motion itself, noting that it focused on improving emergency medical response systems across the country. Specifically, the proposal called for the provision of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in government institutions and public buildings nationwide, with the aim of preventing avoidable deaths resulting from cardiac emergencies.
According to her, the motion highlighted the urgent need to strengthen life-saving infrastructure in public spaces, where timely intervention can significantly improve survival rates during medical crises.
Gwacham’s explanation sought to counter the narrative that she was disengaged or uninformed, emphasizing that the situation was an isolated lapse rather than a reflection of her overall performance as a legislator.
She also expressed appreciation to her constituents for their reactions to the viral clip, noting that many had reached out to her with concern and support.
“I appreciate the calls and messages from constituents who were concerned,” she said. “My focus remains on delivering for the good people of Oyi/Ayamelum, and I remain committed to the responsibilities entrusted to me.”
The lawmaker reaffirmed her dedication to effective representation, stressing that her legislative priorities remain aligned with the needs and interests of her constituency.
The incident has nonetheless reignited broader conversations about legislative conduct, preparedness, and accountability within Nigeria’s lawmaking institutions. Observers note that while seconding a motion is often considered a procedural formality, lawmakers are generally expected to have at least a basic understanding of the issues under consideration.
For critics, the viral moment underscored concerns about the quality of debate and participation in parliamentary proceedings. Supporters, however, have argued that such moments can occur in fast-paced legislative environments, where lawmakers are sometimes called upon without prior notice.
Political analysts suggest that the episode highlights the growing influence of social media in shaping public perception of elected officials. A brief moment captured on video, they note, can quickly escalate into a broader reputational issue, regardless of the surrounding context.
Meanwhile, the motion itself—sponsored by Shagaya—has drawn attention for its focus on public health and emergency preparedness. Advocates say the installation of Automated External Defibrillators in public institutions could significantly reduce fatalities from sudden cardiac arrest, particularly in settings where immediate medical assistance is not readily available.
As discussions continue, Gwacham’s response appears aimed at restoring public confidence while redirecting attention to her legislative work and the substance of the motion in question.
The controversy serves as a reminder of the intense scrutiny faced by public officials and the importance of situational awareness during official proceedings, especially in an era where every moment can be recorded, shared, and debated in real time.
